Menu
Gender detransition (more accurately referred to as retransition or secondary transition) refers to any significant change in a person’s gender-related social, medical, or legal transition after they have previously transitioned from their assigned gender role at birth to another gender identity. It is an umbrella term—people use it in different ways—so it’s helpful to break it down clearly.
Changes in:
Changes in:
Starting/stopping/changing hormone therapy
Pursuing or declining gender-affirming surgeries
Adjusting medical treatment to better align with a person’s evolved gender experience
Changes in:
Updating legal documents again
Adjusting gender markers or names
Gender identity can be complex and fluid. Retransition can occur for many reasons, including:
A person discovers their gender is different from what they initially thought
Their identity becomes clearer as they grow, age, or reflect
They recognize they are nonbinary, genderfluid, or identify differently than before
Retransition may involve regret in a very small percentage of individuals (see below), but for the majority, regret is not the primary motive for retransition—it can be an adaptive, thoughtful response to evolving self-understanding or life circumstances.
Specifically: regret among transfeminine individuals ≈ 4.0%, among transmasculine individuals ≈ 0.8%.
One data summary article, "How Many People Detransition?" reported for youth: 0.8%-7.4% changed their mind before puberty blockers, 1.6%-7.6% stopped blockers, but only 1%-3.8% do so because they no longer wished to transition.
“Detransition Ideology” is not a formal academic term, but it is used in contemporary discourse—usually critically—to describe a Christian Nationalist or Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminist (TERF) set of beliefs or narratives that frame gender transition as inherently harmful or misguided, and that (through hate speech and disinformation) elevates detransition as a preferred or morally superior outcome that "proves the reality of binary sexuality or essentialism".
The phrase is generally used to point out that some actors—typically political, advocacy, or media groups, and individuals—promote "detransition" not merely because of their individual experience, but as a prescriptive worldview.
"Detrans" is a term commonly used to describe a belief system or political framework that:
This framing often asserts:
Medical transition is based on flawed science
Most trans people will regret transition
Clinicians are coercive or negligent
These claims conflict with the bulk of clinical evidence (see "Regret" tab, and tables below), which show low regret rates and high satisfaction among those who transition.
While detransition (and/or retransition) are real and important experiences for some people who deserve care and respect for their bodily autonomy, "Detrans Ideology" treats detransition as the expected or correct outcome for transgender, nonbinary, and otherwise gender diverse people.
This often includes:
Arguments for restricting or banning gender-affirming care
Claims that transitioning is a “social contagion”
Generalizes individual narratives into a universal representation
This reflects a broader anti-trans political project (i.e., Project 2025), not a clinical understanding of detransition. It frames de-medicalization as the morally correct endpoint.
“The DeTrans Discourses” is not a single universally recognized text, book, or academic canon; rather, it’s a term that scholars and critics sometimes use to describe a set of narratives, arguments, and media framings about detransition—usually in highly politicized contexts. Here is a clear, objective breakdown of how the phrase is typically used:
In academic, activist, and media-studies contexts, “the detrans discourses” usually means:
They vary widely:
Many scholars use the term to describe how detransition stories are foregrounded or instrumentalized in public debates—often to:
challenge or restrict gender-affirming care,
argue about social contagion theories,
support informed consent models,
or discredit trans identities.
This isn’t about the people detransitioning, but about how their stories are used by institutions, political actors, and media ecosystems.
In gender and media studies, “detrans discourses” often refers to:
recurrent themes in reporting (e.g., “transition as a mistake,” “therapeutic failure”),
patterns in political testimony,
tropes in anti-trans activism,
and how these shape public perception of trans care.
It’s similar to talking about “panic discourses,” “desistance discourses,” or “moral-panic frameworks.”
These often include:
1. Oversimplification
Media sometimes portrays detransition as far more common than it is, despite studies showing low rates of long-term regret.
2. Erasure of complexity
Many detransitioners describe:
temporary detransition due to family or workplace pressure
lack of access to continued care
retransition later
But public discourse often only highlights regret narratives.
3. Politicization
Detransition stories are frequently used in:
legislative hearings,
legal filings,
think-tank publications,
and media aligned with anti-trans politics.
4. Lack of support for actual detransitioners
Ironically, highly politicized “detrans discourses” often don’t include funding or support for detransitioners’ mental health, medical needs, or social safety—only rhetorical use of their experiences.
You may see the term appear in:
Academic articles on media representation of trans people
Sociological work on gender-panic cycles
Critical discourse analysis in queer and trans studies
Media criticism addressing selective amplification of certain narratives
Scholars associated with analyzing this area (not necessarily using the exact phrase) include:
Jules Gill-Peterson
Florence Ashley
Hil Malatino (“Trans Care,” “Side Affects”)
Avery Dame-Griff
kristen schuitemaker
Tobias Raun
“Detransition rhetoric” refers to the use of stories, studies, and public commentary about individuals who stop or reverse gender transition and subsequently advance particular political, moral, or policy goals.
While individual detransition experiences are real and diverse, their overgeneralized narratives foment political framing that becomes a symbolic battlefield over gender-affirming care, youth rights, and medical authority.
Detransition is framed as evidence of a medical and cultural scandal — a “social contagion” or “mass delusion” induced by “gender ideology.”
Used to justify restrictions or bans on gender-affirming care, particularly for minors.
Progandistic moral framing emphasizes regret, victimization, and harm narratives, presenting detransitioners as whistleblowers.
Think tanks: The Heritage Foundation, American Principles Project, and Family Research Council produce policy briefs on “transgender regret.”
Media outlets: Fox News, Daily Wire, and The Telegraph highlight detransition stories as proof of systemic failure.
Politicians: U.S. state legislators and UK MPs have cited detransition testimony to support anti-trans legislation.
Legislative bans or restrictions on gender-affirming care.
Investigations into medical boards and clinics.
Introduction of “informed consent” bills with heavy restrictions disguised as patient protection.
We aim to provide up-to-date, data-driven information about detransition / retransition.
Many people who retransition state that they are making a choice that better aligns with their genuine sense of self at that time.
Detransition Ideology has no interest in patient well-being or autonomy.
It promotes a singular, genocidal, Christian Nationalist moral conclusion:
(This link contains disinformation and hate speech. View Discretion Advised.)
Most people who transition do not retransition.
Retransition rates in clinical samples are generally <1–2% for medical transition.
Life-event or social-pressure-related pauses are more common than identity-change detransitions.
Permanent regret is rare, consistently <1% in long-term clinical studies of gender-affirming surgery.