Menu
Extremist disinformation and hate come in many forms, wearing different hats, and carrying signs and symbols that represent and promote transmisia (hatred of trans+ people) through theocratic mythologies, toxic masculinity, authoritarianism, political mobilization, racism, and Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminism.
They share an ultimate goal: socially erasing, then eradicating trans+ people through suicide induced by fear, hopelessness, and denial of access to human rights, civil rights, gender-affirming healthcare, and genocide by legislation and authoritarian policies.
-Jenn Burleton
Social erasure refers to the systematic isolation, suppression, distortion, and/or non-recognition of a group, identity, event, or knowledge system within the cultural, political, or historical record. It can occur through omission, censorship, forced assimilation, archival destruction, epistemic reframing, structural exclusion, or coordinated action.
Major Organizations Driving Social Erasure:
Key Strategists & "Messengers":
BIG PICTURE
"Bathroom Bills" create a precedent: if a trans girl is defined as “male” for bathrooms, the same definition can be extended everywhere else.
Framing The Discrimination
The emergence of anti-trans "bathroom bills" in 2013-20141 (see footnote below) was framed by those pushing such bills as being about "public safety" or "privacy" concerns; however, the documented evidence behind them reveals a different set of goals.
After decades of self-isolation by trans+ people fearful of social stigmatization and abuse, the growing public and legislative advocacy for the rights of trans+ people from 1990 to 2010 led to increasing visibility and participation in areas of social life that had been denied to them. This increased visibility did not make transmisic, mythology extremists, and Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminists (TERFs) happy.
In 2013, Christian Nationalists coordinated local, regional, and national campaigns to manufacture a supposed "danger" related to trans girls and women using sex-segregated girls'/women's restrooms. They did this as a mechanism of social exclusion and isolation, and to establish a legal foothold for increasingly extreme actions, including:
There has never been any evidence that remotely suggests that the use of girls'/women's restrooms by transgender girls and women is dangerous, or threatens anyone's personal privacy other than, most likely, that of the transgender girl or woman, due to harassment from others.
What Is The Real Intention of "Bathroom Bills"?
This aligns with broader patterns in civil rights history, in which targeting essential public facilities (restrooms, water fountains, schools) is used to limit a minority group's full participation in society.
On June 21, 2016, Donald Trump held a private meeting in New York City with around 1,000 “social conservative”/evangelical-Christian leaders. Moderated by former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee, the meeting was "an effort to get Trump to better understand their policy positions.
The Donald J. Trump administration has suppressed or rolled back rights and access for transgender people — drawing on documented policies, executive orders, and their effects. I cover both the first Trump presidency (2017–2021) and the continuing / renewed actions under his current term.
Under Executive Order 14183, signed January 27, 2025, the government ordered the Department of Defense to exclude people whose gender identity differs from their biological sex despite a total lack of evidence that transgender service negatively impacts military readiness and effectiveness.
Starting on the first day of his second term, President Trump began to issue numerous anti-science, non-evidence-based executive actions, several of which directly address or affect health programs, efforts, or policies to meet the health needs of LGBTQ+ people.
That question was asked of three different AI chat bots in mid-September, 2025, shortly after the murder of Christian Nationalist Charlie Kirk. Select a tab to learn how each answered the question.
Overview
Yes, transgender rights are facing significant threats globally, but particularly in the United States as of September 2025. This assessment is based on a surge in restrictive legislation, executive actions, and cultural backlash that have eroded legal protections, access to healthcare, and public safety for transgender individuals. While advocates have successfully blocked many proposals, the volume and extremity of attacks—especially post-2024 U.S. election—indicate a coordinated effort to limit transgender visibility and autonomy. These threats disproportionately affect transgender youth and women, exacerbating mental health crises, discrimination, and violence. However, resistance from civil rights groups and courts has preserved some gains, and public opinion remains mixed, with growing support for restrictions alongside broader acceptance of anti-discrimination measures.
Key Threats in the United States
The U.S. has seen an unprecedented escalation in anti-transgender policies since early 2025, driven by state legislatures and federal executive actions under President Trump. Over 500 anti-trans bills were introduced in 2023-2024, a trend continuing into 2025 with legislation in 49 states. While most fail to pass, dozens have become law, creating a patchwork of restrictions that criminalize aspects of transgender life.
Public Opinion and Cultural Shifts
Counterarguments and Substantiation
Critics, including conservative think tanks like Heritage Foundation (Project 2025), argue these measures protect “biological truth,” women/children from “gender ideology,” and prevent “mutilation.” They claim no evidence ties trans identity to inherent danger, and policies address real issues like sports fairness. Substantiation: Medical bodies (AMA, APA) affirm gender-affirming care as evidence-based, reducing suicide risk by 73%; bans ignore this, per HRW. Violence stats: Trans people face 4x higher homicide rates than cisgender peers (HRC). Politically incorrect claim: While some trans activism has alienated moderates (e.g., aggressive rhetoric on X), the response—erasing legal existence—mirrors historical minority scapegoating, unsubstantiated by crime data linking trans identity to threats.
Ongoing Resistance and Outlook
Yes — there are credible indications that transgender rights are under threat in the U.S. currently, from several legal, policy, and political angles. Whether things are “in danger” depends on what baseline you use (rights secured vs rights still contested), but many advocates and human rights observers believe that trans rights are indeed facing significant challenges. I can lay out what’s going on, what kinds of threats are real, and where things stand. If you want, I can also compare with other countries.
Here are some of the main ways transgender rights are being challenged right now:
Bans on Gender‑Affirming Care for Youth
As of early to mid‑2025, 25 states in the U.S. have passed laws banning or restricting gender‑affirming medical care (puberty blockers, hormones, etc.) for minors. (hrw.org)
These laws have been shown to have serious effects: mental health harms, increased anxiety, depression, suicide attempts in some cases, families being forced to travel out‑of‑state, or avoiding care altogether. (hrw.org)
Federal Executive Orders / Policies Curtailing Rights
There are federal executive orders that affect discrimination protections, access to gender‑affirming care, recognition of gender identity. For example, one order aims to withdraw federal funding from institutions that provide gender‑affirming care to youth. (hrw.org)
Another order rescinds recognition of gender identity in certain federal documents/programs, and restricts trans people’s access in federal healthcare, including programs like Medicaid, or benefits via TRICARE. (hrw.org)
Legal Precedents and Court Decisions
In Tennessee, the Supreme Court upheld a ban on gender‑affirming care for minors. This kind of ruling provides legal cover for similar laws in other states. (AP News)
There are proposals and threats to restrict or revoke Title IX protections (education, access to bathrooms, sports, etc.) for trans youth based on gender identity. (hrw.org)
Participating in Sports, Access to Facilities
Identity Documents, Legal Recognition
Some federal rules or proposals aim to require using sex assigned at birth for gender markers, or to limit recognition of nonbinary gender identity in official documents. (belmontlawjournal.com)
These changes affect the ability of transgender and nonbinary people to have IDs, passports, etc., that reflect their lived identity. (Amnesty International USA)
Harassment, Violence, and Chilling Effects
Inconsistent Protection Across States
Because many rights are decided at the state level (or via state law), there’s a patchwork: some states protect trans rights robustly; others restrict them significantly. That makes where someone lives very important to what rights they can exercise. (hrw.org)
It’s not all one‐way. Some countervailing forces include:
Legal challenges to restrictive laws and executive orders; some courts have blocked enforcement or parts of those laws. (The Guardian)
Medical organizations (AMA, AAP, etc.) generally continue to support gender‑affirming care, and cite evidence of its importance to youth mental health. (hrw.org)
Advocacy and public awareness are high; many communities, organizations, and individuals are pushing back through litigation, protest, and policy efforts.
In some states, protections remain strong or are being strengthened.
“Danger” can be measured in degrees. Some of the things already happening are having real, immediate impact (loss of access to care, legal vulnerability, forced changes in documentation, etc.). Others are threats in progress, or potential: proposed laws, executive orders, etc., which may or may not be upheld.
So yes — for many transgender people, especially youth, people in restrictive states, or marginalized communities, rights are not just theoretical; they are being curtailed in meaningful ways now.
Yes, trans rights are currently in significant danger in the United States, with a sharp increase in laws and executive actions restricting transgender rights, particularly since early 2024 and into 2025. aclu+2
Over 600 anti-LBGTQ bills, most targeting transgender and nonbinary people, are being tracked in state legislatures in 2025. aclu+1
These bills address issues like restricting gender marker changes on IDs, banning gender-affirming healthcare (especially for youth), and limiting trans people’s access to public accommodations such as restrooms. lambdalegal+1
The Trump administration has enacted executive orders revoking federal support for gender-affirming care, including removing protections from health care programs and threatening prosecution for medical providers. hrw+1
Federal agencies have moved to enforce policies recognizing only two sexes, which effectively erases transgender identities from government recognition and protection. pbs
Many hospitals and institutions are halting gender-affirming care for trans youth and adults due to legal fears, dramatically reducing access to needed medical services. aclu+1
Laws targeting ID updates make it harder for transgender people to obtain documents matching their identity, exposing them to discrimination. aclu
Increased political attacks and rhetoric have contributed to higher rates of harassment, threats, and mental health difficulties for the trans community. lambdalegal+1
Organizations such as the ACLU and Lambda Legal are actively fighting these policies in court, and many advocates, families, and allies continue to mobilize in support of trans rights. aclu+1
Despite the onslaught of hostile legislation, most of the proposed laws do not become law, thanks to sustained activism and advocacy. lambdalegal
Trans rights in the United States face unprecedented threats across health care, documentation, public life, and legal recognition, with the situation continuing to draw national and international concern from civil rights groups and medical experts. hrw+4
